Indiana telehealth launch guide · 2026
Start here
To launch a telehealth service in Indiana, start with professional authority and the care model. Indiana ended its separate Telehealth Certificates and Telehealth Facility Certificates on July 1, 2024. The Professional Licensing Agency says practitioners no longer need those certifications or their renewal. Its notice also makes clear that proper Indiana professional licensure remains necessary. Removing an administrative certificate did not remove the underlying professional requirements.
This guide covers patients in Indiana. Ownership, professional authority, prescribing, and payment depend on the service and care model.
Published by Bask Health · Editorial process
Updated
Your launch, mapped out
Indiana
Remove the obsolete certificate from the launch plan
The essentials
Start with the decisions that shape your legal structure and clinical workflow.
| Launch decision | Indiana |
|---|---|
| State requirement | Indiana ended separate practitioner and facility telehealth certificates on July 1, 2024. |
| Regulators | Medical Licensing Board of Indiana |
| Professional ownership | Review the medical entity, permitted owners, clinical control, and management fees with state healthcare counsel. |
| Clinician authority | Check the issued license or applicable state pathway for each profession and service. |
| Patient location | Confirm where the patient is physically located at each encounter, including follow-up. |
| Care format | Have the clinical team match video, telephone, or asynchronous assessment to the patient and applicable rules. |
| Prescriptions | Review the clinician, medication, examination, monitoring, and pharmacy together. |
| Pharmacy fulfillment | Check the actual dispensing location and its authority to serve patients in the state. |
| Patient information | Map clinical and nonclinical data, vendor access, consent, and applicable privacy duties. |
| Payment model | Separate direct-payment terms from payer coverage, enrollment, and reimbursement requirements. |
Summary only, not legal advice. Confirm the requirements for your business with Indiana counsel.
These references support the discussion in each step. Operational suggestions are separate from legal requirements.
Local planning
Include patients who travel between Indiana and neighboring states. Test patient-location checks before appointments and prescription renewals.
A useful launch plan starts with a narrow service definition. Specify the patient group, treatment, follow-up schedule, and geographic area. Then test whether your clinical team and local partners can deliver it.
Interview prospective patients about appointment access, travel, language, and payment preferences. Check their ability to use the intended care format. These interviews inform the operating plan; they do not establish market size or clinical eligibility.
Indiana ended its separate Telehealth Certificates and Telehealth Facility Certificates on July 1, 2024. The Professional Licensing Agency says practitioners no longer need those certifications or their renewal. Its notice also makes clear that proper Indiana professional licensure remains necessary. Removing an administrative certificate did not remove the underlying professional requirements.
Sources: Indiana PLA: telehealth certification changes effective July 1, 2024.
Use the current professional credential as the roster check. Do not spend launch time renewing a discontinued telehealth certificate or relying on an old form still found online. Have counsel review the current requirements for clinicians physically outside Indiana. Test patient-location checks and the handling of a clinician whose primary license expires.
The steps below are operating recommendations. The linked state material supports the specific legal summary above. Your advisers must apply current law to your actual entity, clinicians, products, and patients.
Step by step
Use these eight steps to turn the Indiana service plan into assigned work. Finish the clinical and legal decisions before configuring the patient journey around them.
Indiana permanently ended separate Telehealth Certificates and Telehealth Facility Certificates effective July 1, 2024. The Professional Licensing Agency's notice also says practitioners still need proper Indiana professional licensure. A discontinued telehealth certificate should disappear from the startup checklist, while the underlying authority to practice remains a prerequisite. Read the PLA notice.
Audit any inherited credential spreadsheet for certificate numbers, renewal tasks, and old facility forms. Label historical documents accurately so staff do not mistake them for current credentials. Replace the obsolete field with the current professional license or other applicable authority, its verification date, and any restrictions relevant to the service.
This cleanup should also reach contracts with clinical networks and recruiting vendors. Ask them to explain the current Indiana pathway for each professional rather than supplying a legacy certificate. Do not make the launch dependent on obtaining a credential the state no longer issues, or assume its elimination allows unrestricted out-of-state practice.
Indiana's current framework addresses professionals physically outside the state who establish a relationship with, or decide whether to prescribe for, someone located in Indiana. The PLA explains the associated submission to Indiana jurisdiction and law, including provisions affecting the professional's employer or contractor. Review the out-of-state section of PLA's telehealth guidance.
Discuss that language with counsel when contracting with a national clinical group. Show where the practitioners work, where patients attend, and which entities employ or contract with the professionals. A contract choosing another state's law should not be assumed to settle every claim involving Indiana care.
Record both sides of the encounter accurately. A practitioner moving between offices and a patient traveling near Illinois, Kentucky, Michigan, or Ohio can create different authorization questions. The scheduling system should know the patient's current state before assigning care, while credentialing should understand the professional's actual work arrangement. Ask the insurance adviser to review the same facts so coverage discussions reflect the service being offered.
Discuss the care model and integrations for your Indiana launch.
Indiana does more than preserve the general care standard. Its telehealth provisions prohibit an employer from requiring remote services when the practitioner believes they would harm care quality or fall below the in-person standard. Applicable contracts and policies must explicitly allow the practitioner to refuse telehealth in the circumstances described. See the employment provisions under IC 25-1-9.5-7.
Translate that rule into both legal documents and everyday operations. Review performance targets, refund processes, and escalation scripts for pressure to complete an unsuitable encounter. The clinician should be able to request in-person assessment without needing approval from a sales manager or defending the decision against a promised prescription rate.
Give patients a clear next step when that happens. State whether a consultation charge applies, what outside care may cost, and how relevant records can be provided. Test the workflow with a case the clinical director has designated as inappropriate for remote treatment. A contractual right to refuse is difficult to exercise if the software offers only approve or abandon.
The PLA's summary of Indiana's relationship requirements includes patient identity and location, professional disclosures, informed consent, history, and information needed for diagnosis. It also calls for discussion of the diagnosis, supporting evidence, treatment risks and benefits, and when in-person care is advisable. Read the relationship requirements.
Use that framework to design an encounter that patients can understand. Intake can collect facts beforehand, but it should not substitute for the professional's explanation of the assessment. Ask the clinical group how the proposed format enables questions and how it records decisions when several treatment options are reasonable.
Review the visible journey from the patient's perspective. Confirm that the person's location is requested for the current visit, that the clinician's role is understandable, and that treatment consent is distinguishable from promotional permission. If an interpreter or representative participates, have the practice apply the appropriate process and document who was involved. A checked consent box by itself does not demonstrate that the clinical discussion occurred.
Indiana's telehealth requirements include follow-up instructions and a visit summary identifying any prescription. The statute also contains primary-care notification provisions, including conditions involving patient consent, supplied contact information, shared records, and ongoing relationships. Those details should be reviewed rather than reduced to a universal send-everything rule. See PLA's records and relationship guidance.
Ask the practice to define how it collects primary-care contact details and the permissions relevant to notification. Have counsel approve the applicable exceptions and the clinical team decide what information accompanies a handoff. Make the completion of a notification task visible without implying that the receiving practice has reviewed the message.
Test a consultation ending without a prescription as well as one resulting in an order. Both patients need an accurate summary and next steps. The summary should distinguish a new prescription from an unchanged medication reported in history. Confirm that patients can retrieve it after leaving the visit and know where to direct a correction or a follow-up clinical question.
Indiana's controlled-substance telehealth provisions include a valid state controlled-substance registration, applicable federal conditions, a legitimate medical purpose, real-time two-way audiovisual communication, and INSPECT compliance. The state's general prescription provision also distinguishes opioids, with a specified partial-agonist exception for opioid dependence. Read the prescribing sections of PLA's guidance.
Review the proposed drug list with counsel and the clinical director before building the request form. Document which clinician credentials, encounter evidence, and monitoring steps must be available. Do not assume that a workflow approved for a noncontrolled prescription also works for a controlled medication or for a different indication.
A failed video connection is an important release test here. The team needs a clinically appropriate next step and accurate documentation of the format used, rather than silently finishing an encounter by telephone and treating it as audiovisual. Connect any prescription problem with the responsible clinician. Pharmacy clarification, duplicate requests, and unsuccessful transmission should remain open until someone records the actual outcome.
Indiana has detailed telehealth conditions for ophthalmic-device prescriptions. The PLA describes age limits for eyeglass and contact-lens patients, required history, a prior comprehensive in-person examination, additional contact-lens fitting considerations, limits on successive remote refractions, and continuing online access to the signed prescription. Review IC 25-1-9.5-13 in the agency guidance.
If the company is considering vision services, bring those requirements into a separate product review. A general medical intake does not establish the necessary examination history or equipment suitability. Have the eye-care professional define what evidence is accepted and how the technology supports an informed diagnosis and treatment plan.
The operational dependency is broader than the consultation. Patients need access to the resulting prescription, and the practice needs a way to distinguish an eligible follow-up from a case requiring another comprehensive examination. Build those functions before advertising online renewals. If the initial business does not offer vision care, keep it outside the catalog instead of implying that one Indiana telehealth approval covers every device and specialty.
Choose safe test records that exercise Indiana's particular requirements. Walk through location disclosure, clinician identification, consent, the explanation of a diagnosis, the visit summary, and any primary-care communication. Include a professional declining remote care and a controlled-prescription encounter whose video fails.
For each case, compare the patient-facing message with the actual clinical status. A prescription awaiting review should not look like an approved order. A referral should identify a useful next action, and an after-hours message should state when the practice can respond. Have administrative and clinical staff conduct the handoff together so neither assumes the other owns it.
Use the rehearsal to finalize staffing and prices. Account for clinician follow-up, prescription coordination, records tasks, professional renewals, and outside services that patients may need. Ask Indiana healthcare counsel to review the ownership and management agreements with the actual financial flow. Removing the obsolete certificate shortens one administrative list; readiness still depends on a clinical operation that can meet its remaining commitments.
What to launch
Choose a Indiana treatment category with your clinical team. These examples describe operating decisions, not promises of patient eligibility or partner availability.
Indiana's jurisdiction provisions make the contracting structure relevant even after separate telehealth certificates ended. Identify the treating professionals, their employers or contractors, and the patients' encounter locations. Review authority and insurance with those facts in view. Remote staffing should not obscure which practice is accountable when a patient needs records, follow-up, or an answer to a complaint.
The Indiana audiovisual and registration conditions deserve a dedicated workflow with reliable encounter evidence and INSPECT review. Plan what happens when the required format cannot be completed or the prescription needs clarification. A recurring subscription should support clinical reassessment and a decision to change course, rather than presenting refills as automatic benefits.
Ophthalmic-device prescriptions have conditions beyond a general telehealth relationship. Review the prior examination, applicable age range, remote-refraction history, technology, and patient access to the final prescription. Those requirements affect eligibility and product design. Keep the eye-care pathway separate from a general questionnaire used for unrelated medical services.
Built for telehealth
Bring the Indiana service plan to a Bask walkthrough. Review intake, clinical records, pharmacy connections, payments, and support against the actual workflow. Confirm integrations and state coverage before signing partner agreements.
Built with Bask
Customer experiences supplied with permission. These are individual testimonials, not independently audited results or evidence of Bask availability in another country.
“Bask has been a cornerstone in our growth at Eden since we first started as a company. Their EHR solutions have not only streamlined our processes but also provided invaluable insights into our business that have helped shape our strategic decisions. They consistently deliver software upgrades that enhance functionality, keeping pace with industry needs. We truly appreciate how responsive they are to feedback, making improvements based on partner requests. Bask’s dedication to innovation and collaboration has been instrumental to our success, and we look forward to what the future holds.”
No. Indiana terminated the separate practitioner and facility telehealth certificates on July 1, 2024. Remove that renewal from current operations, but retain appropriate historical records. Continue checking professional licensure and the other requirements governing the actual service; certificate termination was not a blanket removal of telehealth regulation.
Indiana restricts requiring remote care when the practitioner believes it would negatively affect health or the standard of care. Applicable agreements and policies must expressly preserve the refusal right described in the law. Make that right usable through scheduling, referral, and patient-support processes rather than addressing it only in contract language.
The requirements include appropriate follow-up instructions and a telehealth visit summary with prescription information when applicable. Build a reliable delivery and retrieval method, including when no prescription is issued. Review primary-care notification separately because the statute contains specific conditions and exceptions that depend on the relationship and information available.
The agency's summary calls for real-time, two-way audiovisual communication for the controlled-substance pathway it describes, along with other state and federal conditions. Do not assume a telephone fallback satisfies that requirement. Have the prescriber determine the next step and document the actual encounter format when video is unavailable.
Compare state, city, and country guides. Check the jurisdiction that applies to the patient, clinician, and business before you expand.
Bask Health publishes this AI-assisted guide from the references below. It has not received independent legal or clinical approval. Read the research method and correction policy.
Your next step
Bring your treatment plan, target patient group, and launch dependencies. Discuss the software and integrations your service needs.